A: Equity stripping is:

1. A technique to reduce the apparent equity in an asset
2. Typically used with real estate or other valuable property
3. Involves placing liens or encumbrances on the asset
4. Makes the asset less attractive to potential creditors
5. Often implemented using friendly liens or mortgages
6. Acts as a powerful deterrent to potential lawsuits
​

A: Equity stripping deters lawsuits by:

1. Eliminating the visible equity in the property
2. Making the asset unattractive to attorneys working on contingency
3. Reducing the potential payout from a successful lawsuit
4. Discouraging attorneys from taking on cases with little to no financial benefit
5. Creating a perception that the property owner has limited recoverable assets
6. Potentially stopping legal actions before they even begin

A: The impact on attorneys is significant because:

1. Most attorneys in these cases work on a contingency fee basis
2. They only get paid if they win and collect on the judgment
3. With no equity in the property, there’s no potential payout
4. Attorneys are likely to avoid cases with little chance of financial recovery
5. This creates a first line of defense against potential lawsuits
6. It can protect assets without the need for costly legal battles

A: Consider this scenario:

1. A property owner has a house worth $500,000 with no mortgage
2. They implement equity stripping by taking out a $490,000 loan against the property
3. The loan is held by a friendly entity (e.g., an LLC they control)
4. On paper, the property now has only $10,000 in equity
5. If a potential plaintiff investigates, they see little recoverable value
6. Attorneys are unlikely to pursue a lawsuit for such a small potential recovery

A: While effective, there are considerations:

1. It must be implemented well before any potential claims arise
2. Proper documentation is crucial to avoid claims of fraudulent transfer
3. The strategy needs to be legally sound to withstand potential scrutiny
4. There may be costs associated with setting up and maintaining the structure
5. It may impact the owner’s ability to use the property’s equity for other purposes
6. Professional guidance is essential to implement the strategy correctly

A: The process typically involves:

1. Taking out a loan against the equity in the property
2. Using a separate LLC or other entity as the lender
3. Recording a lien or mortgage against the property
4. Moving the borrowed funds to a protected entity or account
5. Maintaining proper documentation for the loan and payments
6. Regular review and potential refinancing to maintain protection

A: Benefits can include:

1. Reducing the attractiveness of assets to potential creditors
2. Maintaining control and use of the asset
3. Potentially deterring lawsuits due to lack of recoverable equity
4. Accessing equity for investment or other purposes while protecting the asset
5. Flexibility in structuring the protection to suit individual needs
6. Potential tax benefits if structured correctly

A: Multiple entity structures can provide protection by:

1. Separating high-risk assets or operations from low-risk ones
2. Isolating valuable assets in separate entities
3. Creating a layered approach to liability protection
4. Allowing for targeted protection strategies for different asset types
5. Facilitating more efficient tax planning
6. Providing flexibility in business operations and growth

A: Certainly. Consider a company with various aspects:

1. An operating LLC for day-to-day business activities
2. A separate LLC to hold and lease equipment to the operating LLC
3. Another LLC to employ staff and lease them to the operating LLC
4. An intellectual property holding company to own and license IP
5. A real estate LLC to own and lease business premises
6. A holding company or LLLP to own interests in the other entities

A: This structure provides protection by:

1. Isolating liabilities within each entity
2. Protecting valuable assets (equipment, IP, real estate) from operational risks
3. Creating multiple layers of separation between assets and potential claimants
4. Allowing for strategic allocation of income and expenses
5. Providing flexibility in ownership and management of different aspects
6. Potentially deterring lawsuits due to the complexity of the structure

A: Potential downsides include:

1. Increased complexity in management and accounting
2. Higher costs for formation and maintenance of multiple entities
3. Need for careful documentation of inter-company transactions
4. Potential for increased scrutiny from tax authorities
5. Complexity in banking and financial management
6. Necessity for ongoing professional guidance to maintain effectiveness

A: We can assist by:

1. Analyzing your current business and asset structure
2. Recommending appropriate protection strategies based on your specific situation
3. Designing a comprehensive multi-entity structure if appropriate
4. Implementing equity stripping techniques where beneficial
5. Providing ongoing support and guidance for maintaining the structures
6. Regularly reviewing and updating your protection strategies as needed

A: It’s advisable to review:

1. Annually at a minimum
2. When acquiring new significant assets
3. If there are changes in business operations or structure
4. When there are relevant changes in laws or regulations
5. If your personal or business financial situation changes significantly
6. Any time you have concerns about your current level of protection

A: While beneficial, they may not be suitable for everyone. Consider:

1. The value of assets needing protection
2. The level of liability risk in your business or personal life
3. The complexity you’re willing to manage in your business structure
4. The costs associated with implementing and maintaining these strategies
5. Your long-term business and personal financial goals
6. State-specific laws and regulations that may impact effectiveness